That is how the Board invited counsel to proceed. Logically, it was necessary for the Privy Council to consider separately and first the appeal against the second judgment of the Court of Appeal. In the second judgment the Court of Appeal rejected a motion to recall the first judgment on the ground that Blanchard J, who gave the principal judgment, was disqualified by apparent bias. The second judgment under appeal is dated 27 November 2000. The principal judgment under appeal is dated 11 April 2000. There are two appeals against judgments of the New Zealand Court of Appeal before the Privy Council. REASONS FOR REPORT OF THE LORDS OF THE JUDICIALħth May 2002, Delivered the 29th May 2002 Attorney General for New Zealand Respondents (1) Auckland City Council (formerly Waiheke County Man O''War Station Ltd & Anor v Auckland City Council & Anor (1) (New Zealand) UKPC 28 ()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |